Quick Form Download

DD Form 2130-15 — DD Form 2130-15, C-130J-30 Load Plan, 20151120draft

C-130J-30 Load Plan

Download the form

The scope here is Department-wide. DD Form 2130-15 — DD Form 2130-15, C-130J-30 Load Plan, 20151120draft — exists to C-130J-30 Load Plan, and it applies across the services rather than inside one. That is what the DD prefix encodes: joint issue, single edition, every branch and defense agency working from identical paper.

Requirement traces to not stated; the form belongs to not stated. Everything about schedule sits below that in local instruction, which is where to ask if a date matters.

Use not stated, status not stated. Older printings circulate widely and lose their currency Department-wide the moment a new edition issues.

The set is PDF. Size: 2 pages, about 200 fields.

Xfdl is a legacy Department format, IBM Lotus Forms, requiring the matching viewer. Its survival in DD distribution reflects how widely it was fielded across the Department, not any advantage over pdf today.

Free download, every format. Do not fill the form in a browser tab — browser pdf viewers handle interactive fields inconsistently and discard entries on close.

What the form asks for

  • 1. UNIT BEING AIRLIFTED (Name or Number)
  • 2. UNIT IDENTIFICATION CODE
  • 3. TYPE MOVEMENT PLAN
  • 4. MOVEMENT DATE
  • 5. UNIT AIRCRAFT LOAD NO.
  • page
  • of_pages
  • 6. MISSION NUMBER
  • 7. AIRCRAFT SERIAL NUMBER
  • 8. CONFIGURATION
  • 9. DEPARTURE AIRFIELD
  • 10. DESTINATION AIRLIFTED
  • a. LOAD SEQUENCE_Row_1
  • REMARKS CODE (From col. h.)_Row_1
  • OTHER REMARKS_Row_1
  • LENGTH_Row_1
  • WIDTH_Row_1
  • HEIGHT_Row_1
  • a. LOAD SEQUENCE_Row_2
  • a. LOAD SEQUENCE_Row_3
  • a. LOAD SEQUENCE_Row_4
  • a. LOAD SEQUENCE_Row_5
  • a. LOAD SEQUENCE_Row_6
  • a. LOAD SEQUENCE_Row_7

Verify the edition before the first keystroke. The date on the form face should read not stated. If it does not, discard the file. Field numbering shifts between editions, and on a DD form the new layout reaches every receiving office in every service at once — there is no lag during which the old version is still normal somewhere.

Fill top to bottom. Identification, then substance, then certification — lower fields commonly derive from the header, and completing out of order produces internal contradictions a reviewer will catch.

Nothing stays blank. N/A on an inapplicable item, because an empty box is indistinguishable from a skipped question and the form returns for it. Dates follow the format printed beside the field, not local habit — a joint form is read by clerks in several services with different date conventions, and ambiguity is expensive.

Read the Privacy Act Statement before entering identifiers, not after. Four facts are in it: authority, purpose, routine uses, consequence of declining. Its placement ahead of the data fields is deliberate.

Certification closes the form. Ink on paper, or a digital signature — normally CAC-applied — in software that supports it. Typed text in the signature box is a name, not an execution. Enter the date beside it before closing the file.

Check before submitting. The recurring failures are edition mismatch, gaps in required boxes, unreadable scanned handwriting, wrong date format, and certification without signature or date. Field-level questions go to the printed instructions, then to not stated, which is authoritative.

Submit to the office named in not stated or in local instruction; retain a duplicate before it leaves. Joint routing often sends a DD form across organizational boundaries, and tracing one afterward is not a same-day matter.

A number is a complete address in the DD series. Because the sequence is Department-level and not duplicated per service, there is nothing further to specify.

Where a procedure cites both a service form and a DD form, the two are unconnected. Service numbering answers to a service proponent, DD numbering to not stated or another Department office, and the two sequences were never aligned. Matching numbers mean nothing whatever.

Three drivers of revision: directive reissue, altered collection requirements, updated statutory notice text. No notification accompanies any of them, so download fresh and confirm not stated rather than reusing an archived file.

Limits of this page: it distributes a published Department of Defense document and describes it. No legal advice, no procedural ruling, no statement about whether any submission will be accepted. Applicability, eligibility and procedure belong to not stated, to a servicing personnel office, or to the office named in not stated.

Questions and answers

What is DD Form 2130-15?
DD Form 2130-15, C-130J-30 Load Plan, 20151120draft
Which edition is current?
Not stated by the publisher
Who is responsible for this form?
Not stated
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF

Other forms in the series